| Removal Of Inactive Members Houses | |
|
|
Remove Inactive Houses/Shops? | Yes | | 21% | [ 3 ] | No | | 50% | [ 7 ] | Give Three Days Notice Before Removal | | 21% | [ 3 ] | Other | | 7% | [ 1 ] |
| Total Votes : 14 | | Poll closed |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Papanator Admin
Posts : 204 Join date : 2010-10-30 Age : 32 Location : England
| Subject: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 7:37 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Papanator Admin
Posts : 204 Join date : 2010-10-30 Age : 32 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 7:55 am | |
| If you have voted other, please tell me the other suggestion rather then leaving it -_- | |
|
| |
Eliofjah
Posts : 18 Join date : 2010-10-30
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 8:43 am | |
| in my opinion we have a very very very very large map to work with no sense in taking out what is there when you could simply build more. Minecraft really doesnt have that many things to do, one is mine for diamond to make diamond items to mine for more diamond, two is to build and enjoy eachothers creativity not shoot it down. | |
|
| |
nice2835
Posts : 381 Join date : 2010-10-30 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 8:55 am | |
| i am in agreeableness with eli | |
|
| |
Papanator Admin
Posts : 204 Join date : 2010-10-30 Age : 32 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 10:07 am | |
| well il take down then what people havent had permission for to build and leave their house...maybe | |
|
| |
nice2835
Posts : 381 Join date : 2010-10-30 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 2:31 pm | |
| MOSt have had permission form ne0. | |
|
| |
willpapp Guest
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 9:00 pm | |
| Neo's not here anymore. All im doing is cleaning up the city |
|
| |
Dan Moderator
Posts : 120 Join date : 2010-10-29 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 23rd 2010, 11:37 pm | |
| I think the idea is good and it should be applied in the crowded zones of the city but only for those buildings that aren't so pleasing or that stand in the way of another building. I think Neo would have done the same thing if he was still around. This could bring abit of freshness to central Iza. As well as some moneymaking if Will wants to hire demolishers | |
|
| |
Papanator Admin
Posts : 204 Join date : 2010-10-30 Age : 32 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 24th 2010, 10:57 am | |
| i already hire demolishers if you wanna help i pay 10 mossy and 1 diamond per large structure, thanks dan | |
|
| |
freggi Moderator
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-11-01
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 25th 2010, 3:50 am | |
| Hmmm, shouldn't this be at Iza's forum area? I thought you meant inactive houses all around the server. | |
|
| |
Papanator Admin
Posts : 204 Join date : 2010-10-30 Age : 32 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses November 25th 2010, 5:08 am | |
| well it is for all around the server in seperate citys if you agree to it. But for Iza. | |
|
| |
austin101 Moderator
Posts : 104 Join date : 2010-10-29
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses December 10th 2010, 4:19 am | |
| I missed the poll, but I would vote yes.
This is how ghost towns get started. IF the players no longer play on the server and some wants to build over their land, I say let them. Post a sign in front of their structure with a two or 3 week notice. If they don't reply then its safe to assume they don't use that lot anymore. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Removal Of Inactive Members Houses | |
| |
|
| |
| Removal Of Inactive Members Houses | |
|